Am I the only one?
Am I the only one who does not buy for ONE MINUTE that there were NOT weapons of mass destruction in Iraq? I mean, come on. Saddam? NOT having WMDs? Excuse me while I go laugh my hiney off.
(And yes, I know what all the investigations have said. Blah blah blah. Whatever. Not buying it.)
whimsy wrote,
nah, you’re not the only one. I’m pretty sure he had some or was trying his darndest to get them.
Link | November 9th, 2006 at 3:30 pm
Jeanne wrote,
Of course he had them! He had already used them on the Kurds!
Link | November 10th, 2006 at 11:08 am
Barbara R. wrote,
No, you’re not the only one. It’s amazing how people can believe that Saddam did NOT have any.
Link | November 10th, 2006 at 3:32 pm
I agree. There are a lot of questionable issues with this war, but this one was never in doubt for me.
Link | November 18th, 2006 at 12:51 pm
Victoria St. Gelais wrote,
Of course, he had them. Everyone thought so, even Clinton. Ask the Kurds if he had them. If I thought my sons were smoking pot in their bedroom and I told them, repeatedly, that they needed to let me in to check and they didn’t, then I told them for several weeks that I was coming in “ready or not”, do you think I’d find any evidence of pot by the time I got there? We advertised our attack for weeks. We told them, right down to the day, when we were coming. They had time to move them and we have pictures to prove it. Funny, you can’t seem to find those pics on the web anymore…
Link | October 10th, 2007 at 11:13 am