Created To Be His Help Meet - Chapter 4
Chapter 4 begins with the heading of "My Jolly Playmate." I think that is what this section was about, since I can see glimpses of it, but there was a lot more involved to the story Mrs. Pearl shares. She tells of a time when her husband was acting all macho and took the trash out for her. He normally does not take the trash out at all. She went with him, carrying something else, and when they got to the dumpster, he threw the bag at the dumpster, very macho-like. The bag broke, sending trash everywhere. Instead of helping to pick it up, he slinked off, embarrassed. (And left her to clean it up.)
Some other time, he had the opportunity to re-prove his manliness, so he took the trash out again. Just as he got to the dumpster and was throwing it, she screamed at him through a window to scare him. He came running, and she acted all innocent. Then he swooped her up and carried her to the bedroom. She goes on with story, but I'll stop.
She then expounds on how we are to be each other's playmate. Some quotes I found enjoyable:
Page 42:
laughter always makes life easier to climb
Page 43:
We have learned that all of life is fun and needs to be shared with our best friend, playmate, and lover. This, then, is the rule of life for wives: Live with thanksgiving, forgiveness, and joy, and enjoy all your moments as if they were your last. Someday, soon enough, they will be.
In the last section of the chapter, she encourages women that their past does not have to be their future. Jesus loves us, NO MATTER WHAT our past is like. We can start fresh today. Page 47:
The message to you is simple. From this day forth, starting right now - today - be the woman who honors, obeys, and loves Jesus, by honoring your husband.
So ultimately this chapter was about thanksgiving. We need to not take our husbands for granted - we must be THANKFUL for them. We must be thankful for what Christ has done for us.
The PRINCIPLES she shares and is imparting to us in this chapter, I am SO on board with, and I agree totally. However, my fear is that those who read this book will take Mrs. Pearl's examples and think that this is how this principle is always fleshed out, and that can be dangerous. (And I have been a woman who has tried to apply the "method" as much as the principle, so I do know that some women do this.)
I'll be honest. The trash scenario bothered me. I even had my husband read it to see what he thought. For one, he couldn't quite figure out what Mrs. Pearl's POINT was, since the section was on how we need to be our husband's playmate, yet this example contained so much more than that. He did think it was rude of Mr. Pearl, and we discussed how that is just so not like him at all. But it doesn't matter so much what our husbands do (to a point) but what our response is.
I can honestly say that IF my husband had done that (or something of that nature), I wouldn't be so much angry as I would be hurt. Mostly because that is SOOOO out of character for him. For my husband to make a huge mess (not just an ordinary mess like we all make, but a Real Mess) and then just LEAVE me to pick it up would be incredibly cruel to me, and THAT is what would hurt - that my husband did something cruel to me. The trash wouldn't be the Real Issue at all.
Now, would that give me the right to stew about it, feel sorry for myself for having such a "mean husband," pout, grumble as I picked up the trash, etc.?
ABSOLUTELY NOT! But it also doesn't mean that I wouldn't be able to go to my husband say, "Hey honey, you know, when you left me to clean up the trash, that really hurt." And then TALK ABOUT IT. My husband would need to know that that hurt my feelings. I'd need to know that he was just so embarrassed he had to be alone right then. Etc. My fear is that a woman might read this section and think that it's OK for a husband to do something hurtful and for the wife to suppress any sort of hurt feelings and never let her husband into her heart, for fear of being "unsubmissive." You can be submissive AND HONEST.
Also, there are times when in order to be a GOOD help meet, a wife may need to let something go. She could easily do something for her husband, to "fix it," but if this is an ongoing pattern, perhaps the best way to be a good help meet is to let it go and let the chips fall where they may, rather than fixing it. So many times in the name of "being submissive" a woman ends up taking the responsibility for her husband's sin, and that is not Biblical submission. It's a tough call as to how this actually looks, since we all have different personalities, our husbands have different personalities, the situations are different, etc. There have been some things I've done to be a true HELP MEET to my husband that many would consider "unsubmissive" (and in other marriages WOULD be unsubmissive!). But I know without a doubt that my actions were Biblical and exactly what God wanted me to do, and in no way was I being Biblically unsubmissive. (I've learned the hard way that there is a difference between submissive and BIBLICALLY submissive. :-()
My concern is that women will take Mrs. Pearl's METHOD and turn it into a universal truth, since that is how it is presented. But since we are all SO DIFFERENT, to do so can be detrimental to a marriage. The PRINCIPLES she shares in this chapter (be thankful, be your husband's playmate, etc.), ARE universal truths, but how it is actually played out in each marriage will vary so widely. The way that Mrs. Pearl has written this book, it appears that that is what she is saying too - that her method is the way the principle is played out. Period. That isn't the case, and I'm fearful that there are women out there who are like what I used to be like and who will not realize that it's not the case.

VyckieB wrote,
Kirsten - thanks so much for including your review of this book in your blog. I can see that you are really trying to be fair in your critique - I would say you are being overly generous. The message which we all appreciate from Mrs. Pearl - that we ought to serve our husbands, be fun-loving, grateful, encouraging, etc. is the sugar that keeps us sipping from her poisonous brew. Even as you strive to be equitable, please do not hesitate to proclaim that the Emperor has no clothes
Link | May 26th, 2005 at 4:13 pm
razorbackmama wrote,
Thanks for your comment Vyckie!
(Just wait till I get to chapter 11. I read it the other day and was somewhat appalled. *sigh* )
Link | May 26th, 2005 at 4:19 pm
Anonymous wrote,
First, thank you for this blog, your analysis is great.
Second, don’t we teach our children to clean up their own messes when they’re, say, one or two??
Did Mr. Messy miss that lesson?
What concerns me more than anything is these composit men (Mr Command, et.al. are allegidly repersenting G-d to the us? Doesn’t that border on blasphemy and isn’t transposing the human shortcomings represented in these three composit husbands on G-d just a little worrysome to anyone else?
Link | May 27th, 2005 at 5:22 am
Kelli wrote,
Kirstin,
I hope you are keeping a copy of each review. You never know if you will need to share it with someone someday. This is excellent and you saved me money! LOL.
Link | May 27th, 2005 at 5:26 am
razorbackmama wrote,
Anonymous,
Exactly - it would be disobedience for the children (or the wife!) to just let the mess lie there. But I guess in the dad’s case the house rules are suspended for whatever he wants? :-S
I agree 100% with your take on the Mr. Command et al stuff. I’ll comment on that when I get to that chapter.
(Ya’ll are getting ahead of me LOLOL!)
Kelli,
That’s what this blog is for.
Link | May 27th, 2005 at 9:22 am
Corrie wrote,
Hi Kristen,
I have enjoyed reading your reviews and I agree with the things you point out as “good” and those that you point out as not so good.
It really is refreshing to see someone else bravely step out of the box and review something fairly. So often if we let our disagreement about some popular teaching in the homeschool movement be known, we are labeled very quickly.
I found the whole kitchen scene to be disturbing. He didn’t just “carry her off”. He grabbed her by the arm and started pulling her to the bedroom. “Since he outweighs me by a hundred pounds, it was no contest, although he had to drag me all the way.” She says that she was ready for another scream if their business mgr. were to walk in on them in order to see the horror on his face. Can you imagine? Michael dragging his wife forcefully by her arm and she resisting? It would have been disturbing to watch.
She goes on to say that “Mike thought he was going to scare me with his show of force, but he was dragging me to my favorite winning spot: the bedroom.” While he shut and locked the door, she tells us that she arranged herself in a seductive pose that gets him everytime. She says “It sure is handy being a woman.”
I find this part troubling. He came to show her who is boss by dragging her by her arm to the bedroom, shutting and locking the door and having s*x with her?
Considering that there are a lot of men in the world who do like to do this very thing to women in order to show just “who is boss”, I think this kind of thing could be dangerous in the wrong hands.
Some man who has a problem might just do this and think that it is okay to force his wife into the bedroom to show his dominion over her.
I agree with you that the book kind of leaves, in the mind of the reader, the thought that this is the way to carry out the principle.
It seems like this whole garbage situation boils down to pride and thinking of one’s self more than one ought. I can’t imagine Jesus doing this with the women who surrounded Him?
I probably wouldn’t have cleaned it up. It would have sat there. I wouldn’t have stewed about it, either. We very much stunt our children when we step in and clean up their messes that were caused by sin and I believe it does the same thing when a spouse constantly does that for the other spouse. Sometimes we have to be faced with our own self-made messes until we realize the problem we have.
Corrie
Link | May 27th, 2005 at 5:57 pm
Carla wrote,
Keer,
I totally agree. There is such a fine line between principle and method. The principle of showing thanksgiving and joy is SOOO important. I was just discussing the verse “What has happened to all your joy?” in Galatians with the kids; we were talking about how our joy should be visible to others! (Joy being different than fake happiness!)
Like you, though, the Pearls methods are just so far away from how our family works. I find myself wishing that she would just speak to the principle and leave the examples out of it. The garbage example appalled me.
Link | May 27th, 2005 at 8:28 pm
razorbackmama wrote,
Ditto ditto ditto Corrie!!! Thanks so much for commenting and thanks for your encouragement! I HAVE been receiving flak from some people about my comments about this book. Oh well.
As I’ve said, there ARE bits of good here and there…there is just lots of bad.
I didn’t really read the kitchen scenario in the same way that you did. I assumed that Mrs. Pearl was as eager to get to the bedroom as he was and that she was just faking not wanting to go. But YES, YOU ARE RIGHT…in the wrong hands this sort of scenario could be taken the wrong way and in effect “give permission” for a husband to rape his wife. I am NOT saying that the Pearls are saying that that is OK to do, but when one is involved in a wide-scale ministry such as theirs, and when one writes books on marriage, one simply must assume that others will apply the advice incorrectly and be CRYSTAL CLEAR about that advice. It seems that Mrs. Pearl has failed to do that. In other discussions I’ve had about this book, I have heard/read countless people say, “I didn’t take it that way at all…I assume she means…What she really means is…etc.” Either Mrs. Pearl has done a poor job of writing and is requiring that her readers assume more than what is actually there, or her advice is just plain bad. I’m HOPING it’s the former, but I just don’t know.
I would have left the mess as well, and like you, I wouldn’t have stewed about it…it would have just sat there and I would have gone on with my day.
Carla,
You are so right - joy is different from fake happiness! I have had joy while I’ve been sad, and I’ve also been happy while NOT having joy. I need to do better at showing my JOY and letting THAT just ooze out, rather that plastering a fake smile on my face.
Link | May 28th, 2005 at 2:34 pm
Holly wrote,
Keer,
First of all, Happy Anniversary!
The trash incident bothered me, and I read it to my husband, too. He was appalled. We both think it was rude to leave the stinky trash for his woman to clean up. Talk about prideful! My husband pointed out that Jesus was the ultimate example for a man…he was the servant/leader…He humbled himself as a servant, even unto death.
Seems we are supposed to admire (according to Mrs. Pearl) this manly man, and afford him his pride.
I think, more than anything, this leaves me feeling thankful for my own husband, and that he would never treat me like that.
Link | May 29th, 2005 at 9:55 am
razorbackmama wrote,
Yes, yes, and YES Holly!!!!! My husband was appalled also. And yes, it makes me thankful for him, that he would never even consider doing that to me.
Link | May 29th, 2005 at 10:57 am
carol wrote,
The review and resulting fixating on examples are perfect examples of jezebels “straining at a gnat and swallowing a camel.” The righteous feminist indignation eclipses the points once again.
Debi deliberately intended the incident to illustrate how her response (or lack thereof) dealt with a situation that other women would have had a fight with their husbands over. (the “trash” is a metaphor for “he spends too much money”, “he went out with the guys when I cooked a great meal,” and all sorts of “wrongs” women use as excuses to not honor their husbands.) I mean, she said as much. How can you so totally miss and oversimplify the point and sit there like a pharisee pondering the faults of michael Pearl, the antithesis of trash man, and let yourself and others get so irreperably sidetracked from the book’s point?
She knew women reading her book would have in mind some fault of their husband to use as an excuse to not heed her advice…she has to relate to them to get their attention and tell them ’so what…you married Adam, not Jesus Christ…treat him like Lord anyway.’ She has to use examples that would stire up our own righteous indignations to show us how those responses can be turned around. Her points later on covers situations where women will divorce over something like not taking out the trash (or leaving messes), to more serious situations. She points out how women have much more power by their behaviors and responses to shape the behaviors of their husbands. She never says we are *responsible* for a bad choice of our husbands, but it is truth to see how we can be an influence, good or bad.
Through this book and his marriage videos, it is obvious that Michael Pearl nearly worships the ground she walks on, yet the nearsighted sees the trash incident as eclipsing the big picture..and THAT jezebel spirit is that which prevails in the world. Someone implied that they won’t spend money to read the book now because of the jezebels here whining about the trash incident. That is such a pity! Satan wins again.
Proverbs 14:1 Every wise woman buildeth her house: but the foolish plucketh it down with her hands.
Link | May 29th, 2005 at 4:30 pm
razorbackmama wrote,
How funny…JUST THIS MORNING I was thinking about my blog and wondering when I would be called a Jezebel by someone for disagreeing with something the Pearls said.
Carol,
I’m sorry that you have missed the points that I and the commenters were trying to make.
And “feminist” - oh my…if you had a clue you would know that I am the polar opposite.
I’d defend myself against your uncalled for attack on me, but I’m afraid I’d be wasting my time, so I won’t.
The key to remember is that we are accountable to God for our actions in light of what the Bible says. NOT what Debi Pearl says the Bible says.
Link | May 29th, 2005 at 4:44 pm
Corrie wrote,
Hi Carol,
How are you today? Thank you for your thoughts. I will go to the Lord and have Him search me. I certainly don’t want to be a Jezebel! Yikes! Jezebels are harsh, manipulative, game players. I don’t like to play games or manipulate! I know it is suggested that we women manipulate our husbands by stomping our feet and shaking our curls but that reminds me of being a Jezebel. It doesn’t seem honest. We are not little girls and when my little girls do that, they are sat down and told how unpleasing that is. I guess I see a Jezebel as something other than the way you define it.
I think it would be quite silly for a woman to divorce over a man who did not take out the trash or pick up his dirty underwear. I would bet that most of the other women would say the same thing. I am just guessing here. I don’t want to ASSUME anything.
Also you say: “She points out how women have much more power by their behaviors and responses to shape the behaviors of their husbands.”
It intrigues me. We learn in this book that men are the spiritual leaders and the ones who are supposed to be bringing their wives along spiritually but in all actuality the burden seems to be on the woman to help her husband grow spiritually. She shows him the way by her example.
I don’t think there is any one way to respond to the trash incident. Mr. Pearl is a TEACHER. He is supposed to be an example. Debi tells her readers that he is bossy, expects to be served, controlling, etc. She gives us an example of gross disregard towards another human being. Would he do this to a stranger? Someone he was trying to reach with the gospel? How well would this have gone over in ministering to the prisoners in jail that he talks about? Would he do this to a person in his church? Would he make a filthy mess and then just leave it for anyone to clean up? Is a leader, a teacher, expect to be served? I was under the impression the bible teaches that a leader is to serve others.
I am concerned about the overall message this sends out. I enjoy some of Mr. Pearl’s writings but the examples I read about make me think that he is not qualified to be a minister or teacher.
I wouldn’t have picked up the trash. Maybe if my husband told me to pick it up, then I probably would and I would pray for him the whole time while picking it up. But, my husband would never expect such a thing from me. Yes, he leaves his dirty underwear and socks on the floor. I just pick them up. It doesn’t bother me. I don’t let it get my knickers in a twist. It isn’t important to make an issue out of it. He doesn’t expect me to pick it up, either. I am his counterpart, his other half not his personal assistant.
I don’t think it makes anyone a Jezebel because they are concerned about some things written in a book. We are supposed to be like the Bereans. We are to be discerning. We are to test all things. After all, this is a book, not the Bible we are talking about. And I believe that the examples in this book could be dangerous in the hands of those who misunderstand her intent and think that it is okay to expect to be served.
I hope you have a great Memorial Day holiday.
God Bless,
Corriejo
Link | May 29th, 2005 at 7:54 pm
razorbackmama wrote,
Thank you Corrie, I share your thoughts totally. We ARE to be good Bereans and weigh EVERYTHING against the Word of God. And that is precisely what I am doing.
Thank you for saying what I wanted to but couldn’t find the words to in a polite manner.
Link | May 29th, 2005 at 8:06 pm
Barbara (poconobarb) wrote,
WOW!!! Kirsten, i really love ya! i think you are being extemely fair minded in this review of Mrs Pearl’s book….jezebel indeed!
i completely agree and back you in your comment “The key to remember is that we are accountable to God for our actions in light of what the Bible says. NOT what Debi Pearl says the Bible says.” It is a scary thought that some would just READ this book and NOT the corresponding scripture to see the issue…she does quote scripture, right?
Thanks again!
Link | May 30th, 2005 at 12:27 pm
Anonymous wrote,
Again, I take issue with basic and deep character flaws being overlooked and fed. No one but G-d is to be “Lord” in anyone’s life. To place the husband in a position that is naturally reserved for G-d alone and somehow tranlating serious character flaws into attributes of G-d gives me pause.
Yes, wives should be respectful of their husbands but, yes, husbands are to love their wives as Christ loved the Chruch==sacrificial love.
Without this balance (Biblical balance) there is serious potential for abuse.
Link | May 30th, 2005 at 5:49 pm
Anonymous wrote,
I’m a bit slow on the uptake but was I just called Jezebel??
Didn’t ‘old Jez worship Baal and sacrifice children to idols.
How can someone who calls people with whom she disagrees but have not displayed any concrete sin Jezebel and go on to say we are taking our concerns out of perspective??
Link | May 30th, 2005 at 5:51 pm
razorbackmama wrote,
PRECISELY, Anonymous!
And yes, we were all called “Jezebels.” Probably since the Pearls use similar tactics - call people names if they disagree with anything they say or try to warn others about things they say. http://www.nogreaterjoy.org/index.php?id=25&backPID=27&tt_news=221 So I guess that makes it OK to do?????
Link | May 30th, 2005 at 6:16 pm
Anonymous wrote,
No it doesn’t.
I’m working on the assumption that people represented here are Christians doing their best to understand the Word of G-d and apply those principals in their lives.
Having a “Spirit of Jezebel” is a serious accusation and shouldn’t be lodged against Christian Sisters to win a debate point.
Link | June 1st, 2005 at 5:18 am
Serena wrote,
I know this is really after everyone else discussed this but I am really enjoying this discussion and since I wholeheartedly agree with the need to be Bereans and to have “Biblical” submission and do not agree with everything in this book, I guess that makes me a Jezebel, too. I’ve been accused of that in the past when I was part of an abusive fellowship that had the marks of much of what I see in this book. I even told the pastor’s wife that I needed to be a Berean and couldn’t blindly follow the “leadership.” It was one of the experiences of life that Father has used to work His work in me and I am thankful for that.
It is sad when those that say they love Yeshua(Jesus) treat others the way you all were treated just for disagreeing with this book. My husband is reading it and so far is quite upset with it and was downright angry about the trash incident.
I am going to enjoy reading the rest of the commentary on this book and hopefully will catch up with you all on it.
Love and shalom,
Serena
Link | July 6th, 2005 at 8:36 pm
razorbackmama wrote,
Welcome to the Jezebel Club, Serena! *g*
Link | July 6th, 2005 at 8:57 pm
Dana wrote,
This is like a year later, but this quote has my head spinning, “Mike thought he was going to scare me with his show of force, but he was dragging me to my favorite winning spot: the bedroom.”
I haven’t read the book and wish to be careful about judging something based only on a few quotes, but that seems out there somewhere. He WANTED to scare her? I wouldn’t be so bothered if it were “impressed” or some other word more related to what I would think of from a “macho” man trying to show-off to his wife. But scare? Through s*x? And our guide to submission says this is her favorite winning spot? Who is being manipulative, coercive and dishonest? I didn’t think my role in my marriage had anything to do with “winning.” When I win, we tend to both lose.
Link | March 28th, 2006 at 12:44 am